11-18-2018, 11:40 AM
|
#1
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
How do you rank our top 4 forwards?
The last three years Johnny Gaudreau has been clearly our best forward, largely on the back of his offensive production. He's lead the team in scoring by an average of 13 points per season, and more than any other player on the roster he's got fans on the edge of their seat. Up until recently, it was also clear that Monahan was #2 with another clear gap in offensive production before the next guy. You could argue Tkachuk in that spot as well, especially with his goal-scoring taking a major step forward last year, but for the most part it hasn't been difficult to rank our top forwards.
This year, with Tkachuk taking another step offensively and adding Lindholm to the mix, I've never been less sure of how to rank them. Looking at their stats through 20 games there's next to nothing separating them: - Elias Lindholm: 11 Goals, 10 Assists, 21 Points
- Sean Monahan: 10 Goals, 11 Assists, 21 Points
- Matthew Tkachuk: 9 Goals, 12 Assists, 21 Points
- Johnny Gaudreau: 6 Goals, 14 Assists, 20 Points
So how do you rank them? Do you value Gaudreau's offensive creativity and playmaking? Lindholm's all-around solidity in every facet of the game? Tkachuk's rare combo of grit, skill, and hockey IQ? Or Monahan's sixth sense and ability to find the right place at the right time? Likewise, which flaws matter more to you? Gaudreau's size? Tkachuk's skating? Monahan's puck handling? (I actually can't think of a significant flaw for Lindholm)
Some other random stats:
Lindholm has the most powerplay points (9) and fewest 5v5 (8)
Monahan has the fewest PP points (6) and most 5v5 (12)
Tkachuk has 7 on the PP, 10 5v5
Gaudreau has 7 on the PP, 11 5v5
At 5v5 Tkachuk has points on 90% of his line's goals (Monahan 75%, Gaudreau 73%, Lindholm 57%)
I'd probably rank them like this: - Tkachuk: The fact that he can keep up offensively with the other 3 while playing a shutdown role with less talented linemates is amazing. Factor in how many clutch goals he scores and his leadership and that puts him at the top for me.
- Gaudreau: Even though the other 3 are keeping up offensively, he's still the engine that powers our offense. No one else on this roster can rush the puck close to as well as he can with as little help. I fully expect him to lead the team in scoring by a decent margin by the end of the year.
- Lindholm: At times I think he might be our best overall forward, but I just need to see a bigger sample size of the same to bump him up. He seems to touch every dimension of our team in a positive way. His defensive play lets Monahan cheat offensively a bit more, he's an excellent PKer, a huge part of our powerplay. His chemistry with Gaudreau has been every bit as good as Monahan as well.
- Monahan: Feels weird having him 4th, but someone had to be here. Of the four, I think his flaws as a player are the most noticeable. He definitely leans on Gaudreau in transition more than I'd like, and he doesn't create as much as the other 3 with the puck on his stick. But he's practically clairvoyant when it comes to getting open where the puck's going to be and nobody finishes those chances better.
I've gone back and forth on the order a million times, and the gaps between them are tiny. Obviously when you can't decide which of your 4 point-per-game players is best, that's a great problem to have. Curious what the rest of you think.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kovaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:44 AM
|
#2
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I think it's pretty clear at this point that Tkachuk is the best player on the Flames and deserves to be the highest paid.
We're probably looking at 9+ for his next contract. Say goodbye to the Gio cap
I would say Tkachuk's passing skills are the 2nd best on the team, behind Johnny. But his shot is significantly better than Gaudreau. Obviously Tkachuck has a lot of other intangibles that put him over Gaudreau. For one I think his puck protection is the best on the team, especially on the boards.
But it's Tkachuck's hockey IQ that is probably tops on the team.
We saw glimpses of this from his last year but he has really taken a step this year.
Last edited by Zoller; 11-18-2018 at 11:48 AM.
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:46 AM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
$9M for Tkachuk? He better score 100+pts this year then
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:47 AM
|
#4
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoller
I think it's pretty clear at this point that Tkachuk is the best player on the Flames and deserves to be the highest paid.
We're probably looking at 9+ for his next contract. Say goodbye to the Gio cap
|
Yeah Tkachuk for sure, production, two way play ... and so many intangibles.
Still can't believe Treliving added a 23 year old core forward locked up for term, and a solid 22 year old second pairing defenseman for Hamilton, an expiring contract Ferland and the rights to a player that was never going to sign here. I liked the trade day one because it was one core out two in, but I didn't expect Lindholm to fit in as well as he did.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:49 AM
|
#5
|
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Gaudreau is still the best. He brings an offensive game that is very rare. If he was bigger and had a slightly better physical and defensive game, Gaudreau would be a top forward in the league.
Tkachuk is playing like #2 on the team for all the reasons you've stated.
Monahan at #3. He looks like a much more complete player this year.
Lindholm at #4. He's the top line RW the team needed. However he also benefits from having Gaudreau double teamed and playing with one of the best duos in the league. He's far more consistent than previous attempts at #1 RWs. A bonafide top 6 forward, but not an all star level player.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:49 AM
|
#6
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
oh and I really wanted to answer "their height" in my best Ty Webb voice (Caddyshack)
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:50 AM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
1) Still Gaudreau - I think we're misusing him in some areas - on the PP we should be using him like Hartley did on the right, at 5v5 I think he misses Ferland's ability in the corners. He's still the most dynamic player we have and the only one in the same stratosphere as Pettersson, McDavid, Getzlaf, Kovalchuk, Kopitar, and Karlsson as far as the elite playmakers in our division.
2) Tkachuk - His hockey IQ, passing, and scoring instincts are off the charts. If he improves his skating and edgework he will be in that above tier of elite playmakers. Just not quite there yet and not able to dominate shifts the same way... yet.
3) Lindholm - I wish he played center, because he looks to have all the tools to be a number one in the vein of Toews. He's a bit guilty of forcing pucks where there's no pass to be made, and his SH% is obviously inflated this year, but he's been really impressive. Also a good example for why I think Sam Bennett has the ability to really take off, they've had similar career arcs, with some contextual differences.
4) Monahan - when he's not scoring, he's invisible and often even a liability defensively. He does score often, though.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 11-18-2018 at 11:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 11:54 AM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Each bring something different but something very important to the team. Nice top end of our lineup. No point ranking them, right now they are essentially tied in terms of their value to the success of the team.
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 12:01 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Gaudreau
Tkachuk
Monahan
Lindholm
You can't argue with monahan's production, but I can see why people who don't follow our team undervalue him
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to killer_carlson For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 12:09 PM
|
#10
|
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Stockholm
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
Gaudreau
Tkachuk
Monahan
Lindholm
You can't argue with monahan's production, but I can see why people who don't follow our team undervalue him
|
I would copy/paste this.
Love that Lindholm took this next step when coming to Calgary.
Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 12:14 PM
|
#11
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
I'll also add, for some context, the thing I'm most curious about is how the rest of you see Lindholm stacking up against the other 3. When we made the trade it felt like we were replacing a complimentary player in Ferland with a better complimentary player in Lindholm. I think at this point he's clearly a core player. If he keeps producing and finishes with 70+ points while being a driving force on the powerplay, elite faceoff guy, and key PKer - is he our best overall player? Obviously jumping the gun to call him that now, but his ceiling in my mind is way higher than it was a month and a half ago.
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 12:17 PM
|
#12
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Calgary
|
I was thinking about this last night. every other year you'd automatically assume Johnny would be the Flame going to the All star game, this year, it could be a number of, or multiple guys.
__________________
The Delhi police have announced the formation of a crack team dedicated to nabbing the elusive 'Monkey Man' and offered a reward for his -- or its -- capture.
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 12:49 PM
|
#13
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Gaudreau is the #1 for sure IMO. He may not end up with the most goals or points, but he is the "something different" the Flames have that isn't a conventional offensive threat. The other 3 are all great players, but they are also prototypical players whereas Gaudreau has an element that is not as defendable and his threat grows larger when he is surrounded by better players because his primary potency is playmaking.
I would say the other three are basically all equal in their impact and importance to the team (along with a few defenders). They all bring a different dynamic that is important to have in a quality team so I don't think you can really rank one over the other.
But I do think with Gaudreau this team has a player that is something no other team has. Thats obviously not to say that other teams dont have great players that are arguably better than Gaudreau, just that he has a skillset that is uncommon and is more of a "cherry on top" than a player that is a necessary piece because there are only a handful in the league and you're lucky to have one so just bloody enjoy it.
__________________
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 02:52 PM
|
#14
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
When points are this close, I would usually default to the rule of centers (and defenseman) before wingers. It's just a more important role.
However A, Lindholm can play center, B Tkachuk is a really special package, and C Johnny Hockey. This is a tough one.
I would however go with Monahan and Gaudreau over Lindholm and Tkachuk, for now. The former two have proven their ability to play at this level consistently, the latter two have not, yet. I fully expect it from Tkachuk to be honest, Lindholm I can see coming down to earth still. (As in wouldn't surprise me. Not that the opposite would surprise me that much either.)
Monahan might not have quite the two-way game you'd hope from a #1 center, he's still better defensively than Johnny. And again, centers are more important. Plus Monahan is pretty damned clutch, and he's shown he can do just fine without Gaudreau.
It's funny that putting our top center first is almost a contrarian move, but that's just my conclusion here
#1 Monahan
#2 Gaudreau
#3 Tkachuk, he's pretty special
#4 Lindholm, because somebody has to be last in this group.
I might rank this differently by the end of the season.
Last edited by Itse; 11-18-2018 at 02:57 PM.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 03:01 PM
|
#15
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Gaudreau
Tkachuk
Lindholm
Monahan
I have lindholm ahead of Monahan because he’s a beast in his own zone and on pk.
I have Gaudreau ahead of everone still as his ability to carry the puck and gain the zone is easily the best on the team and other teams still focus on him more than anyone on team and he gets toughest match ups
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 03:07 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Versatility:
1. Lindholm
2. Tkachuk
3. Monahan
4. Gaudreau
Skill:
1. Gaudreau
2. Tkachuk
3. Lindhom
4. Monahan
Clutch:
1. Monahan
2. Tkachuk
3. Lindholm
4. Gaudreau
Grit:
1. Tkachuk
2. Lindholm
3. Monahan
4. Gaudreau
Vision:
1. Gaudreau
2. Lindholm
3. Tkachuk
4. Monahan
Skating:
1. Gaudreau
2. Lindholm
3. Monahan
4. Tkachuk
Too many tools to really bead on a proper ranking but I think it's really easy to name your top 4 FW's.
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2018, 03:12 PM
|
#17
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Gaudreau is ahead of Tkachuk in terms of game breaking skill, but Tkachuk is more consistent and offers a much more well rounded game. You need both kinds of players to win.
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 03:49 PM
|
#19
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
|
So far this year.
Tkachuk
Lindholm
Gaudreau
Monahan
Gaudreau still has probably the best skillset but he's becoming to predictable to defend as he rarely shoots the puck and always almost looks for the pass instead.
Seems also he's being targeted more physically this year.
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 03:52 PM
|
#20
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
4) Monahan - when he's not scoring, he's invisible and often even a liability defensively. He does score often, though.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
You can't argue with monahan's production, but I can see why people who don't follow our team undervalue him
|
Hope the guy above doesn't follow our team. Terrible take. Borderline offensive.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.
|
|