06-04-2013, 03:13 PM
|
#1
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
NHLPA votes to grandfather in visors
Per multiple sources on twitter
RT @DarrenDreger: Visors will be grandfathered in. #Hybrid icing tested in NHL preseason. Shallower nets to be used next season. All subject to board approval
Last edited by sureLoss; 06-04-2013 at 03:15 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:14 PM
|
#2
|
#1 Goaltender
|
How will this affect fighting and instigators?
What do they do in other leagues such as the AHL?
__________________
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:16 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Per multiple sources on twitter
RT @DarrenDreger: Visors will be grandfathered in. #Hybrid icing tested in NHL preseason. Shallower nets to be used next season. All subject to board approval
|
What is the point of this?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:18 PM
|
#4
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
What is the point of this?
|
pretty obvious, it makes more room behind the net.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moncton golden flames For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:18 PM
|
#5
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
What is the point of this?
|
More room for play making behind them.
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:19 PM
|
#6
|
First Line Centre
|
Even if they grandfather in the visors, it will take like 15 years before we see the last of the visor-less players.
As far as shallower nets, I believe it will make more space behind the net, and also less pucks to be trapped on the netting?
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:21 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
More room for play making behind them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moncton golden flames
pretty obvious, it makes more room behind the net.
|
Thanks
I have a memory them trying to increase/decrease the space behind the net before. Is that correct?
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:22 PM
|
#8
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Better late than never.
Next up after hybrid no-touch icing: hard capped elbow pads.
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:23 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
can somebody explain what "to grandfather in" means? Mandatory for everybody? Mandatory for players entering the league? I'm confused
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:24 PM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
can somebody explain what "to grandfather in" means? Mandatory for everybody? Mandatory for players entering the league? I'm confused 
|
Just like helmets, if you didn't wear one before the rule, you don't have to wear one now. If you come into the league post rule change you wear one.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:25 PM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
Just like helmets, if you didn't wear one before the rule, you don't have to wear one now. If you come into the league post rule change you wear one.
|
Thanks! I love English, but using grandfather as a verb seems like a weird idea
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:26 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
|
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger 58s Players who have played 26 or more NHL regular season or playoff games will not have to wear a visor under grandfather agreement.
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:26 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
can somebody explain what "to grandfather in" means? Mandatory for everybody? Mandatory for players entering the league? I'm confused 
|
Yes mandatory for new players. Existing players have the choice. Good rule IMO as I feel you have to have a slight mental disability to conclude that a visor hinders more than it helps. Especially with the advanced optics involved in them now. Also add in that anyone Comin in has had to use at least a visor up until the NHL
__________________
Last edited by Coach; 06-04-2013 at 11:02 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:28 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Good for the league IMO. what a difference it could have made in a few players careers.
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:31 PM
|
#15
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Also significant is the recommendation that all 4 minute high sticking penalties will get a mandatory video review.
May lead to other penalty calls being reviewable down the road.
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:33 PM
|
#16
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User
How will this affect fighting and instigators?
What do they do in other leagues such as the AHL?
|
@reporterchris: The penalty for starting a fight with a visor on will be changed, per Colin Campbell.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:54 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
That's a pretty good chunk of players:
John Shannon@JSportsnet1m
Can confirm that in excess of 80% of players polled by the NHLPA agreed with "grandfathering" visors.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!
Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
|
|
|
06-04-2013, 03:54 PM
|
#18
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Regina
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Also significant is the recommendation that all 4 minute high sticking penalties will get a mandatory video review.
May lead to other penalty calls being reviewable down the road.
|
Would love to see this rule changed too (4 minutes high sticking penalty). If you get high sticked and you are not wearing a visor, where wearing a visor would have prevented you from being cut, the penalty is only 2 minutes and not 4. NHLPA would never sign off on this though.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to May 25, 1989 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 04:09 PM
|
#19
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
@reporterchris: The penalty for starting a fight with a visor on will be changed, per Colin Campbell.
|
Fighting will be gone within the decade. This is a step in that direction. One that I'm all for.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-04-2013, 04:13 PM
|
#20
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Typical generational discrimination.
Grandfathers have a difficult enough time keeping up in today's NHL. But now the remaining baby boomers in the players ranks are expected to have the moxie to take puck and sticks in the face, while those young wimpy Generation Y players get the protection of plastic shields.
Sigh, kids today. They just don't have the gumption to spit out some teeth or blink out an eyeball and then finish their shift . . .
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Meers For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 PM.
|
|