Thread: Define a Core
View Single Post
Old 09-19-2020, 09:33 PM   #46
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Inner Core:
C
C
D
G

IMO every cup winner in the cup era has met the following test: 2.5 of the above were 'elite'.

Since we're in a bit of a semantics thread, I think I've come up with a decent definition for the oft-argued term. 'Elite': good enough to be legitimately in the conversation to play for Team Canada (on their own merit - not Muzzin/Kunitz, and regardless of nationality).

Obviously there is a grey-area between 'definitely/definitely not TC quality', hence the half point above.


A few obvious caveats:
1. Having the above ingredients doesn't guarantee anything (see FLA). There are many, many other things needed.
2. Chicken/egg is certainly at play, but having the knowledge/certainty on every piece before the fact doesn't really matter.
3. Most cup winners also have elite winger(s), but not all. '09 Penguins. '12/ '14 Kings and '06 Hurricanes are debatable. I contend that this falls under the many, many other things that are needed.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to powderjunkie For This Useful Post: