View Single Post
Old 05-20-2022, 10:57 AM   #28
Johnny199r
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uzbekistan
Exp:
Default

I've worked on cases similar to this one.

The media and the public are not understanding the basis and future application of this decision.

In order for this defence to succeed, an accused needs to doctor to state that they were in a state of automatism. That is a high, high bar which will disqualify 99.99% of accused people.

Next there is the issue of foreseeability. I don't think this defence is going to be available for a meth addict who gets violent all the time on meth. The cases that the SCC and ONCA have applied it to are mushrooms and anti smoking medication, where the effects weren't really forseeable.

The SCC stated in their decision that parliament needs different legislation to address this issue while not violating an accused's charter rights. I believe parliament will respond quickly with new legislation.

All of the social media outrage and other uninformed, bad takes are frustrating for someone in the criminal law world. The floodgates have not opened.

Last edited by Johnny199r; 05-20-2022 at 10:59 AM.
Johnny199r is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Johnny199r For This Useful Post: