Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
I assume all the defense can really do is point out things that can provide some doubt. Things like you didn't find his finger prints at the house, no shoes matching the shoe prints, you didn't monitor the burn barrel so anyone could have walked in and done it, there are no passwords on the computer or email so anyone could have used it.
And yes, currently the prosecution is calling witnesses. That's how it works?
|
To me, doubt only works if there's only a few key pieces of evidence. In this case, despite there being some doubt on certain pieces, there is a LOT of evidence that starts to stack up.