NAL, but if you read paragraphs 70-74, you get into the meat of the complaint. It's not so much for saying the girl was underage, but for saying what they did despite the fact they knew or should have known the girl was not underage, failing to mention the accounts of other people who challenged CTV's claims - which CTV should have had access to before their story was published - and for failing to disclose the fact that the CTV reporters who filed the story had personal relationships with the accusers.
|