Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology
By that same line, the owners aren't fronting 1/3 the cost either since they get to recoup that cost from ticket sales. For the life of me, I don't understand why it's unreasonable for the city to be repaid for their financial investment.
In what loan transaction is that not an expectation?
|
What is fronted, and what is ultimately paid by each side is not going to be the same thing. That obviously is a point of contention between the two.
Also, the Flames clearly are clearly looking for a level of straight public funding, not just a loan, so that is a second point.