Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Yeah that had me curious too.
I thought the land was a swap with the Stampede board for the land under the Saddledome. That wouldn't be an expenditure if so.
Yet that gets muddied because of the olympic bid where the city has the Dome and the Corral still in use meaning they can't knock it down because the city needs to use it.
Either way not sure those two costs should be considered part of the city's contribution if the above is correct.
|
Really would depend on the current agreement with CSEC on who had to pay it when/if it was no longer in use.
They are also paying for the infrastructure to get people to/from the place which isn't included in their 33%.