View Single Post
Old 11-15-2021, 11:41 AM   #231
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimalTates View Post
You have the luxury of hindsight.
I thought that's how we were treating these issues, using the luxury of hindsight? Isn't that why people are bringing up the fact that Rittenhouse shot a pedophile among other things? Do we think Rittenhouse knew the guy was a pedophile and was just doing his civic duty? Come on.

If we're going to talk about these situations as they were, knowing what we know today, we should do that. If we want to talk about them strictly with what was known by the people involved at the time, let's do that. If we're going to say one issue gets the hindsight treatment and one doesn't, that doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?

Even your version of events isn't true. "The cops were called because a man who was not suppose to be there was now trying to take a vehicle with the children of his alleged victim of whom he had a restraining order for sexual assault and a warrant. That’s what the cops knew."

Here's what they knew:

Quote:
5:11:12 compl says there is a Jacob Blake her that isn't suppose to be here and he took the compels keys and is refusing to give them back

5:11:28 Jacob is the compls childs father

5:12:07 Jacob is now trying to leave

5:12:52 lvj935 is the plate

5:12:59 compl says he is leavingnw and hungup

5:13:03 Jacob has a 10-99 through Kenosha for tresspass/DV, DC/DV, and DC/DV felony 3rd degree sexual assault

5:16:28 possible shots

5:16:42 shots fired
Where did they find out about the restraining order? Or that Booker was the alleged victim? There are zero reports of that information being shared by Blake, Booker, or witnesses. And they knew those kids were his kids.

That's the benefit of hindsight, no? So are we using it, or not? I'm trying to figure out what rules you want to play by.

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Out 403 View Post
I'm sure you know that most child abductions and harm done to children are by family members and people they know. Not strangers. Just because he's the father doesn't mean he can kidnap them.
es across. Did you really just air quote someone claiming to be a rape victim to score points in a political argument?
Great, but that's not what was happening.

And no, I didn't air quote someone claiming to be a rape victim, I put quotes around words I was quoting from a post I was responding to. Don't be an idiot.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote