Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
It seems ridiculous that the PA would choose nothing over something, and there’s no way they’re going to win this PR battle.
|
If they feel it’s likely they’ll be heading to another lockout if they allow the league to make these changes it makes more sense for the players to miss out on a season where they aren’t going to be getting the full value of their contracts as opposed to one where they would be getting full value.
Also the league has already agreed to terms with the PA and the league is seeking to amend that agreement. So if the players reject the league’s proposal it’ll be the league who will be left with the decision of whether or not they want to play out the season.
I still maintain that the timing of this comes off as as suspicious, if the league is that concerned with the financial implications of player salaries why are they not opting to have 2 host city bubbles again instead of taking on all the additional expenses of running an extra 20+ buildings and incurring all the extra travel costs of flying from city to city? Doesn’t make a lot of sense.