View Single Post
Old 04-14-2015, 07:27 AM   #9
First Line Centre
mrkajz44's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Deep South

Okay, I understand that I am liable for the mortgage, that makes sense. But essentially, I am paying an insurance premium to protect someone else (the investor). I know of no other insurance where I am paying a premium and then not getting any coverage in return. I think its just a backwards way to do things.

If the investor wants insurance, they should insure the mortgage themselves, not the borrower of the funds. At least, that's how I see it.
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
mrkajz44 is offline   Reply With Quote