Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
See the problem is, Shattwnkirk was never a #1D. He was a #4, #5D from the very beginning.
|
This is a ridiculous, utterly revisionist and completely unsupportable position. Shattenkirk was a top pairing defenseman until he got to Washington. Saying he was "always a number 5"... it's just totally insane. This is like looking at the last few years of Heatley's career and saying "well he was always a bottom six forward".
