Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45
I remember the reaction to the Lindholm/Hanifin trade as being pretty split down the middle on here, and that the reaction turned positive when we locked both up long term at under 5mil each
|
Exactly. I don't understand how anyone can look at Hanifin's contract and say he is overpaid (or needs to be moved to clear salary). It reminds me of the Brodie contract upon signing. How it was perceived to be a good value contract just one year after. Good players will always eat up part of the cap. Hanifin is so young, that he can easily blossom into a solid Top 2/3 d-man.