Quote:
Originally Posted by cupofjoe
He would agree. When they are fighting / resisting hard they have to use the techniques they are taught to get them in hand-cuffs. He said particularly if the guy is strong (think meth/coke induced strong), and / or big it can very challenging even with 4 or 5 cops. Sometimes, the techniques include inflicting pain to get compliance. This would include baton to the outside of the calves or arms, but not to head etc.
The big thing he says is once the battle is done (ie cuffs on) it is very important to disengage. No more strikes, no name calling, etc. The goal is to never associate custody with pain or degradation. It will only make them fight harder the next time.
Funny thing he said is one of his most important tools is carrying Kit Kats. He will often offer them Kit Kats shortly after they are arrested or other food / drink back at the precinct. He says he is always surprised how much good-will this buys sometimes.
|
Everything about deescalation makes sense internally:
- the obvious human rights reasons
- less exhausting arrests for officers
- less injuries to officers = happier insurance/workers compensation workers
- less weapons discharges = less paperwork, fewer wasted police hours, less budget usage.
- years of good will from the above = less stress on officers due to less fear in the public. More community support grows. Less officer addictions, health costs.