Quote:
Originally Posted by CGY12
Just watched it. Obvious goal to me as well. Goalie leaps out to cover a rebound, the attacking player lunging to get to it first. Contact made on a 50/50 puck. Rebound is put in.
Whats baffling is they call a penalty on the US goalie for tripping yet disallow the goal for interference?? That makes 0 sense to me. Atrocious.
|
Yeah the penalty adds a really confusing angle to it. The most amazing part of it is that they couldn’t release a reason within minutes. Doesn’t help the situation.
I mean, if they want to allow goals like that that’s one thing. I voiced my opinion on that play, being biased against the states winning. But they really need to explain what the hell happened.