Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
It's quite shocking.
Instead of spending the time to deliberate it seems as though the jurors came to a "compromise" for the sole purpose of getting things over with as quickly as possible.
Unfortunately that "compromise", in the state of Wisconsin, meant 60 years without parole. Like not having him convicted of extra counts was somehow a compromise for him?
|
The Judge at the sentencing is dictating the alarming trend of escalation of Avery's crimes. From what I understand there were a couple of robberies, something involving a cat and then this. But the judge was talking as though Avery had committed the rape, assault and attempted murder that he was fully exonerated of.