I hadn't even heard of him before, but enjoyed that interview if for no other reason than the dynamics between him and the interviewer. A lot of the assertions she put to him were baldly unfair or clearly misconstrued what he was saying - which was perhaps designed to provoke him - but in the end it worked to his advantage I thought, and probably produced a better interview in some ways.
Nothing earth-shattering in there though, so I'm not sure what the fuss is about. I suppose I'll have to look at some of his other interviews now to get a sense of what makes him such a big deal.
|