Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Just so we are totally clear here. The only reason Brodie or Frolik are trade bait is solely based on asset management. Not play. I think we've gotten lost on that here.
Yes there are other options like Hamonic or....or...geezer I dont know who else you can cut from the fw group other than Frolik and his 1 year remaining contract.
Anyways. None of Brodie or Frolik suck, but they certainly aren't core foundational pieces. We need that cap space. And we need cheaper middle 6 rw options.
I dont think we have this conversation if all of Valimaki, Andersson and Kylington showed that can being.something to the table regularly at the NHL level.
Once again this is ASSET MANAGEMENT. Thanks.for reading.
|
Thanks for this post. I look forward to it being entirely in vain and one of the usual suspects starting over the same conversations about Brodie and Frolik which showing zero understanding of how asset management works.
“We are trading him? HE IS BAD THEN! WHY ELSE DO YOU TRADE PLAYERS?” or
“We are trading him? WHY, IF HE IS NOT BAD? WE SHOULD KEEP HIM!”
The salary cap: in existence for 15 years, and still some fans can’t figure it out.