Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
Because IMO the government should not regulate the quantity and content of political speech.
The Cruz case is different though as you can now directly profit from donations made after you win an election. This is blatant bribery.
|
I don't think this one is quite at the particularly horrid level of Citizens United, but it is pretty suspect that you can loan your campaign an unlimited amount of money and then solicit bribes - er, donations - after being elected to repay yourself.