Quote:
Originally Posted by PuckDemon
Exactly. It was evened out in Game 2 already, so there's no reason to say a call in Game 5 would even out a call made in Game 2.
Why are you acting like your opinion isn't exactly the same as everyone else here? Absolutely no one thinks that officiating was the main reason for the series loss.
It's like if I was to say: "My boss is really annoying sometimes, but murdering him would go too far. We really shouldn't be killing anyone just because they're annoying. I'm not going to sit here and pretend that being annoying is enough reason to murder someone."
|
Go back and read the last page again. Hockey_Ninja made a perfectly reasonable post; it was replied to by browna who commented on the 2 Flames wrongfully disallowed goals, while leaving out the Oiler disallowed goal in game 2. The browna post (clearly hammering hard the importance of officiating in contributing to the series outcome) was thanked by a whole bunch of people, so I felt it worthwhile to mention the information that browna left out.
In reality, the disallowed goals in game 2 balanced out, only the disallowed goal in game 5 is worthy of mention from a screwed-the-Flames-over perspective. As I've always acknowledged, the Flames got robbed of the goahead goal with 6 minutes to go in the 3rd in game 5. At no point did I ever deny this.
Not sure what else you want me to say. Hopefully you can make your point next time without some bizarre "murder" analogy.
Quote:
|
Different then the Oilers goal called back completely.
|
No, not really.