Thread: Rule changes!
View Single Post
Old 03-19-2015, 05:31 PM   #84
dsavillian
First Line Centre
 
dsavillian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: losing CPHL bets
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanna Sniper View Post
I can understand that

I too had made a plan to send Tavares, Seguin and Elssis all down to the AHL and resign them there so I had an extra 18-20M to improve my non playoff team. I made decisions just as much for this as anyone else, you can say even more since I was the fool that refused to do it last year I sure as hell wasn't going to let the chance go

But Like I voiced last year and again this year. This is the right move

AS for my plan, tear it up... readjust

But I fail to see how one should be grandfather over the other
Wouldn't those players be subject to re-entry waivers?

Never mind, I see what you are saying.

Honestly, I'd argue that should also be grandfathered in and apply after the start of next season. As you said, it's a legit strategy that you were banking on. Granted, it was a loophole and against the spirit of the re-call waiver rule (or at least I'd argue that), but I would have no issues if we let teams do that this year but not going forward
__________________
Formerly CPHL - LA Kings

Last edited by dsavillian; 03-19-2015 at 05:34 PM.
dsavillian is offline   Reply With Quote