[Bingo]

Originally Posted by marsplasticeraser

I'd respectfully disagree that billionaires don't enter 3% returns for investment decisions. HNW individuals typically have a portfolio with a range of risk-weighted assets generating different returns. Their portfolio will almost certainly include fixed income and utilities that return 1%-5% and have (theoretically) lower volatility than higher risk investments.

From what I've seen the city typically uses their actual cost of capital in their financials, which would be 3%-4%. That's if they bother to include a discount rate at all (they've improved in the last administration it seems, but I recall they often would not discount future cash flows at all!)

It seems there are a few on here who are interested in what a lower discount rate does to the calculations, so why not run it just for interests sake? If you've built the model how I expect it's simply changing one number.

Will do!