Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
What people say is not evidence of anything; people are fallible, memories change.
You also shift from people and put "instruments" in there as well when that wasn't the case at least with the videos that have been discussed; there isn't corroborating radar recordings for example.
Saying a person is trained to recognize airplanes implies they can't be fooled (humans are easy to fool) is just an appeal to authority, also not evidence.
What qualifies as actual evidence isn't controversial.
|
You've done your research on the Tic tac incident and have concluded it was a distant airplane and that Fravor and everyone else directly involved that has come forward must be mistaken. Does it feel good to know what Fravor saw? I'd like to know what that feels like.
Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk