07-27-2022, 11:00 AM
|
#5677
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Checked the dude's background and he has no formal professional or academic training on any of the topics he's speaking/writing about. So, you know, your standard Joe Rogan guest.
|
Here's a good example of someone who actually is an expert on a topic reviewing Schellenberger's work:
Quote:
Unfortunately, the book is deeply and fatally flawed. At the simplest level, it is a polemic based on a strawman argument: To Shellenberger, scientists, “educated elite,” “activist journalists,” and high-profile environmental activists believe incorrectly that the end of the world is coming and yet refuse to support the only solutions that he thinks will work – nuclear energy and uninhibited economic growth.
But even if the author properly understood the complexity and nature of global challenges, which he does not, and got the science right, which he did not, a fatal flaw in his argument is the traditional Cornucopian oversimplification of his solutions – reliance on economic growth and silver-bullet technology. As the great American journalist and humorist H. L. Mencken said, “there is always a well-known solution to every human problem – neat, plausible, and wrong.” Mencken also warned against those who know precisely what is right and what is wrong, a warning especially worth hearing in the highly complex and uncertain worlds of global climate, pandemics, and environmental change.
|
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2...calypse-never/
|
|
|