Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Uh, okay. You're defending a loon who questions "verifiable truth" as a concept. So, assuming what it says about me is that I'm against that and in favour of the scientific method as a primary means of determining what's real, then fantastic, yes, I agree.
|
One can 'question' verifiable truth without throwing away the scientific method. In fact, I would argue they are the same thing (if done rationally and logically).
I have not seen a lack of a scientific method from him, but if you have evidence of such, I would be interested to see it.