Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
You’re right, I misspoke. What I should have said was the greenhouse effect of CO2 relative to that of air.
Here is some work done by Dr. Thomas Allmendinger and Dr. Andreas Rüetschi:
“A Novel Investigation about the Thermal Behaviour of Gases under the Influence of IR-Radiation: A Further Argument against the Greenhouse Thesis”
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-acc....php?aid=87335
It’s interesting work, and I can’t do it justice with a short summary. Ultimately what they found in their study, though, was that the difference in greenhouse effect between pure carbon dioxide and air was negligible.
Edit: a bit more in-depth version of the study in the International Journal of Physical Sciences ( https://www.allphyscon.ch/wordpress/...Gases_IJPS.pdf) |
He proposes with limited justification that about 200 years of modeling and measuring the intensity of GHGs is wrong and instead measuring the limiting twmpteratue is the correct way to do it. Then when his measurement of CO2 and air are similar states that the green house affect isn’t impacted by CO2.
There seems to be a significant lack of justification for why his experiment is actually measuring the properties of the Green House potential of various gasses.