Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing
You can't not believe my interpretation. All you can do is disagree with it.
I don't see any way this could be deemed "deliberate with intent to injure". It makes no sense to me, and I can't see how they came to that finding.
|
Deliberation is practically impossible to prove, and is in fact almost always in these instances determined subjectively from interpretations of the video evidence. The finding that Wideman's actions were deliberate to injure were drawn from the fact that he deliberately hit the official with his stick/hands. Again, I don't expect you to change your opinion about the incident, only I still have a hard time accepting that you see no possibility that the action was deliberate when several posters here have made provided very reasonable explanations for just that.