View Single Post
Old 09-13-2017, 12:17 PM   #16
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
I am pretty sure that CSEC's position is that the city's contribution should be a CRL and paid back via the incremental property taxes for the this new entertainment district and not be paid back by CSEC.
Just to add on here...using my financial wizardry skills:

The city has offered a loan $150-200m with full recoupment of costs. The value of what the city is proposing is worth between C$50-75m based on whether the size of the loan is $150-200m. That works out to a funding ratio of 11-12% based on an arena cost of $450-600m.

The CSEC has asked for 1/3 of arena cost with no recoupment, equating to $150-200m. So the flames are asking for a funding ratio of 33%.

The two sides are off by C$100-125m
GullFoss is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post: