Quote:
Originally Posted by yourbestfriend
Looking at some comparables, in the range of $5.5M AAV over 6/7 years seems pretty reasonable for Hamonic.
Would love him back, don't know why the Flames brass were considering trading him away in the first place.
|
I think neo45 is right. The Flames know they have to move one of their D to A) maximize assets, and B) make room for the kids to play.
Treliving likely looked into moving everyone and Brodie or Hamonic makes the most sense for multiple reasons. I can see why trading Brodie and signing Hamonic helps the Flames in the long run.