Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
The first two words in my post were ‘could be’ which of course is one way to say I’m not espousing a certainty here. I thought lawyers read more carefully than you have on this one 
But you keep going and put words in my mouth if it makes you feel good
|
You then followed that up with this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
Things don’t really add up otherwise.
|
Followed by this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
...my comment was to point out that there is more to this story than what is public.
|
And then finally this:
Quote:
|
he’s obviously covering for something or someone...
|
For a guy who is just putting stuff out there, you sure do sound certain about the opaqueness of the situation, about alternative explanations and about MacDonald's "obvious" cover for the mysterious bad guys behind all of this.
Again, this is ALL stuff that you have invented from whole cloth. There is not a shred of evidence to support any of it. NOT AT ALL.