Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
The release says the ruling was tailored to the specific facts of this case.
The way you can be more clear is by providing an example of what you think would be reasonable to outline.
# of bruises on her body = # of games?
|
Let me try once again to make this clear:
I don't know. Did they decide on 27 games based on the number of bruises on her body? Probably not, but if they did, tell us that. Did they decide based on some internal policy that links the number of games to the sentence he received upon pleading no contest? Probably not, but if they did, tell us that.
I don't know what they did. No one does. They do. They have that information. They can tell us. Then we have the information. I am not going to sit here and guess what the reasoning was. Whatever it was, explain it. What is so hard to understand about this?