Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
It's not that they disagree, it's using untrue information to do so. If they're trying to use economic impact as the hub of their argument, they are being dishonest. It's never been proven, and will never be proven. It's based on vague, intangible assumptions. There's two decades of examples of this all across North America.
And I already said other arguments are valid, but at least be up front about them and don't try to couch them in the above. No one is shouting down anyone.
|
And yet you use the opposite unknowable intangibles as proof that they are wrong.
You are just as guilty of using highly emotionally charged arguments as those you are attempting to attack.