Personally, I think he has a legitimate point, thrown in with a lot of non-sense and thinly veiled hate. The couple of things that I think are worth debate get lost in everything else and it makes talking about it difficult. You have to spend too much effort teasing out the rotten parts that it isn't even worth it.
I also doubt that simply being a student of his blacklists you. Are there actually occupations where having your degree and curriculum list isn't good enough, but you need to say who the profs were? What industries does this happen in? He is way too self absorbed and thinks he is more relevant than he is.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|