Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
I don’t understand how people can be opposed to a procedure that has empirical evidence demonstrating that it contributes to saving lives.
|
Because it violates the charter rights?
You know what else would save lives in this scenario? Summary executions for those found to blow over on road side checkstops. I bet that will save lots of lives too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Checkstops existed well before this. Freely administering a breathalyzer during a checkstop isn't violating the charter of rights unless you have something to hide, then it's a scapgoat argument to use. It's not self incrimninating. Honestly, if it's held solely to checkstops, that's a win IMO. A random pull over for no reason? That's a hill to die on I suppose.
|
I don't have to wait for the Supreme Court to of Canada to rule on this, you are wrong. Period.
If you're argument was this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Checkstops existed well before this.[B] Freely administering a breathalyzer during a checkstop isn't violating the charter of rights.
|
Then I would still disagree with you and say the courts will rule on it.