I have reviewed both tvs on many sites, great reviews for both.. very similar... including sports specific reviews/comments but I would love some expert opinions specifically to hockey! The main difference on these tvs is the refresh rate- 60 vs 120 but based on many reviews, even the 60hz is amazing for sports, no negative reviews, people are saying the motionflow makes up for the 60 vs 120, they have had 120hz tvs not as good as this tv when the motionflow is on, etc etc
$200 usually wouldn't be anything for me but we just bought a house and had our first child at the same time so right now every dollar counts, however, would you say that despite that, the $200 is worth it and there will be a major difference based on the refresh rate difference, all other major specs are the same, processor, size, motion flow, TRILUMINOS ,etc. If you guys feel it would be a huge difference, i will spend the $200 but if its marginal, i would rather save the money based on current scenario of one household full income.
Asking specifically for hockey.. and to a lesser degree sports/movies in general but would appreciate any input! Thanks.
KD65X85J ($1500) vs KD65X80J ( $1300)
https://www.costco.ca/sony-65-in.-4k...100776179.html
vs
https://www.costco.ca/sony-65-in.-4k...100751716.html