Quote:
Originally Posted by McG
With so many people working from home, I don’t think that $100 per month is expensive at all (depending upon speed of connection and allowed bandwidth per billing cycle). I’d go so far as to say that with a decrease in office costs, companies may be entirely willing to pay for people to use this solution.
Onstar as offered to all car manufacturers by GM and no one took it. I wonder if things might be different this time.
|
Facebook was going to start paying people less by allowing them to work from home anywhere in the US. Pay would be based on cost of living. So if you take away the requirement of needing to be in at least a suburban area companies could negotiate both lower office costs and lower Salary costs so this would easily offset $1200 per year in internet cost.