Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
I'd rather the Flames kept Hamonic at that figure, rather than signed Tanev to the Brouwer contract! Nothing against Tanev, but I think that contract was a bit of a lost opportunity...
|
There is nothing wrong with Hamonic's deal, and I also think that the term on Tanev's is too long. But there is no way I swap the two heading into this season. I think that Tanev is a better defenseman, and watching him in last night's scrimmage did nothing to change my mind.