I’ll ask again: what do you think was missing that would’ve been news worthy?
“Only the inflammatory parts” are very likely the only thing that anyone gives a #### to hear about. You want to hear Ford say some non-inflammatory stuff? Great, I believe she has twitter, fill your boots!
I get the spirit of what you’re saying, I just really think in this instance it comes from a place of just not wanting to believe it. We have (some) context, we have a place known for factual reporting and due diligence putting it out there, and we have not had a denial despite multiple comments on it from Ford.
What more do you need? And where do you draw the line between “news worthy” and not?
All this of course being a little bit funny, considering what a FIELD DAY (four years?) conservatives have had milking every last drop out of the photo of Notley at an anti-pipeline rally haha. Some times things turn out funny I guess.
|