Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan
so, it's true?
|
Not in the manner that the misleading article is trying to persuade the reader to believe. The way the article presents it is pretty much a strawman.
The article would be more accurate if it stated that:
"Canada’s revised laws on impaired driving could see police demand breath samples from people in bars, restaurants, or even at home, within two hours of committing a major crime with their vehicle".
And of course the police would have to prove the two hour time line so I imagine you would have to commit a fairly major crime in which a time stamp could be verified for this to hold.