View Single Post
Old 05-10-2014, 01:39 PM   #34
MickMcGeough
First Line Centre
 
MickMcGeough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
Another theory, it's about the wearables.

http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/10/57...-its-the-brand
Yes!

Hi-Fidelity headphones existed before Beats Studios, but only audiophiles cared to spend much on them. There was no mainstream market for $300 headphones. Beats created that market by making a premium fashion accessory that people saw and wanted. Watch this and tell me Beats is marketing audiophile gear:



I know loads of people who'd consider themselves audiophiles. Not one went from a pair of $300 AKGs or Sennheisers to a pair of Beats Studios. For most Beats customers, this is their first foray into high-end headphones. From a marketing standpoint - this is remarkable. They created a product nobody knew they wanted, well outside of mainstream "impulse buy" range. This is what makes Beats worth $3.2B to Apple.

Apple is going to have a similar challenge in wearables. They've got to make wearables that people want to be seen wearing so badly that they'll fork over hundreds. I can't think of a single company that can do that as well as Beats.
__________________

MickMcGeough is offline   Reply With Quote