But the above isn't journalism; they're not reporting on something and trying to explain it in an accurate way that people can understand. They're not even trying to be persuasive. It's just a bunch of opinion by people with a clear agenda who are misrepresenting/glossing over facts to bolster their point.
And if I'm going to listen to someone's opinion on the matter (since it still is a very open question where educated opinions are valuable), it'll be someone who actually knows what they're talking about. Not someone who says that the reason scientists generally favor the natural origin theory is because the "scientific establishment" is involved in a cover up to try protect their grant money/funding.
|