View Single Post
Old 10-25-2020, 01:22 PM   #62
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
First, I don't think it is a good idea to move Lindholm to C.

Second, I think the hockey IQ argument is overdone sometimes. Of course, Johnny needs to play with someone else who thinks the game at a high level. But I don't think the 3rd guy on the line necessarily has to be that as well. Lots of great lines have two intelligent players and one guy that is doing the grunt work along the boards and in front of the net. Bennett can do that.
You may think the IQ thing is "overdone", but Treliving has stated and has clearly shown it is among the most important qualities he values in players. I agree with him. Particularly among top line guys and top pair defensemen.

But Bennett cant be the C....way to many important decisions that guy has to make, particularly in the D zone. Bennett is most certainly not that guy or at least has never shown to be. Coaches just dont trust him defensively which is why he hasnt played there much. Adding him to JG who isnt the most defensively responsible guy either, is a recipe for disaster.
__________________
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post: