Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
Uh, 0.4 percent cap hit? You mean 6 per cent? Or what do you mean?
And if Neal averages 35 points on the second line, sure it's not that bad. But that's a big if given his play last year. He sucked. If he played last year, outside of playing with McDavid, he isn't breaking 25 points...
|
I mean the extra 350,000 a year they are paying compared to keeping Lucic is equal to 0.4 percent of the cap. I am assuming Lucic will be awful so in that scenario a 35 point Neal at 6.35 is probably better than whatever Lucic brings to a team.