View Single Post
Old 05-25-2019, 01:33 PM   #12
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
He would have played a ton of games here and we wouldn’t have had to trade a 4th for Fantenberg who is worse

He cleared waivers also so he could have been kept in the AHL for depth

Treliving basically gave away depth for nothing and then decided to trade for depth at a time when depth costs a premium

Kulak proved in Montreal he is better than Prout, Fantenberg, Kylington and Stone who played 87 games combined for us, so he would have gotten plenty of ice time
Flames did Kulak a favor by dealing him to a better opportunity. Its a move that looks good with players considering to sign in Calgary or not.

Do you think Kulak would have changed our fortunes this season ?
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post: