Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayer
Among the criticisms are the ring tone on his phone, and that he mentioned the Jury having "Asian food" for lunch one day. Oh and also having a round of applause for veterans yesterday....on Veterans Day. Seems reasonable.
His rulings and his anger with the Prosecutors attempts to skirt said rulings, in bad faith, should not be controversial.
As I said, the people wanting Rittenhouse convicted seem to be reaching for anything because they don't see this going well for their cause.
|
And, you know, saying the victims were not allowed to be referred to as "victims" but were allowed to be referred to as "rioters, looters, and arsonists", refused a new arrest warrant when Kyle violated his bond, not allowing the prosecution to present video of Kyle saying he wanted to shoot looters (among other photos and videos that give evidence of motive and sincerity) and not allowing them to present an enlarged image but allowing the defence to present a video of police saying they appreciate Kyle, not allowing the prosecution to ask why Kyle needed an AR-15 for self defence, etc.
Again, why lie and pretend? These are completely fair and reasonable criticisms that seriously call into question the judge's bias.
We can just as easily say that just because you want Rittenhouse to go free you and his supporters are painting him and the judge in the best light possible and ignoring pretty blatant issues.