I get that the article is prefaced by saying that it is based on Game Score numbers. But is illustrates one of the huge problems that hockey analytics currently faces: it makes the analytics the story instead of using the analytics as a tool in making a better story.
First of all, suggesting the team is less talented than last year is laughable. But ignoring that, the primary argument is that the team is worse because DH had better Game Score numbers than the guys coming in. Well sure, but let's not forget that the guys acquired are younger, which in itself is a plus. And let's not forget linemates, quality of competition, etc. Everyone who plays (significantly) with Giordano has better numbers. Period.
The argument goes around and around. Anyone who looks at stats, instead of watching him play, considers him to be one of the premier defensemen in the league. And therefore doesn't like the trade. But the vast majority of people who evaluate him by actually watching him play every night feel differently or very differently.
Oh, and it's worth repeating: suggesting the team is less talented than last year is laughable.
|