[Bunk]

One should probably be careful about dismissing all of anyone’s ideas - but with regard to specific ideas articulated through this NY Times piece - some are extremely odious. The incel, redistributed sex, enforced monogamy stuff here is truly bad. As the writer points out these are at odds with the idea of rejecting equality of outcome - yet he seems to think the ends justify the means here.

Worse, he seems to let a mass murderer off the hook as some sort of victim. That narrative is extremely dangerous. And as a thought leader, it’ll risk getting more people killed.