Quote:
Originally Posted by Traditional_Ale
Aparently he uses a device which allows him to see into the smallest and deepest areas of the lungs. He says that even if someone hasn't smoked anything in 20 years he can still tell by the permanent damage.
|
But how does that prove that a joint is 50 times worse than a smoke?
I'm not debating smoking weed isn't bad, hell I even give people the 1 for 1 as shown by many studies, but 50 to 1? Where is his reserch to prove such a thing?