Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Didn't you just argue in favour of universality? Seems like this argument favours the person with the spouse and kid, doesn't it?
|
You're reaching here. Universality and fairness suggest that couples should be treated equally, which is what I argued. You are are suggesting that the individual should be treated the same as the one income earner with a spouse. Not only are those two situations not the same, but trying to equate them would eliminate the ability to equate the two couples.