Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
I really don’t agree here Bingo. Some team might give Neal a chance, but a 3 year deal? At $3 million per? That would imply some kind of bidding war. He would get a one year, prove me contract IMO.
Forget about expectations, he was plain awful last year and simply no reason to give term to a player like that.
But if what you believe is true, Flames will have no problem dealing him simply by retaining salary. Which they would happily do.
|
You could certainly be right.
I guess I just see a guy with 10 years of production and a down year vs a guy that was never really productive and was signed after a career year.
The career trajectories aren't the same.